The “Fifty Shades” Universal Trailer

Get ready. Uh, brace yourself. Variety:

On Thursday morning, Universal Studios debuted its first trailer for “Fifty Shades of Grey,” the highly anticipated film based on the erotic novels by E.L. James.

The movie stars Jamie Dornan (who appears san [sic] shirt) as Christian Grey and Dakota Johnson as his inexperienced lover Anastasia Steele….

We don’t know yet if the film will be “decent.” (If that’s the right word?) But the quality of the book and its film adaptation are not really the concern here; those are for others to argue about. I’ve not read the book and have no plans to see the film.

I will say this, though. While you might dream a novel you write will one day find itself a film, if it were to do so that film’s actual quality is mostly out of your control. I suppose the bottom line is if you found yourself paid (especially if you were paid “big”) for film rights, I suspect as a writer you would be thrilled to take the money and run. ;-)

But, privately (between just us here…. and the internet), I’d hate to see my book(s) theatrically ruined.

Have a good day, wherever you are reading this….

Avoiding The Cringeworthy

Writing romance that fits properly into a tale? A relationship that comes across as genuine? One which doesn’t read as corny and silly, thus causing a reader to roll eyes? Especially where sex is involved?

Doing that is massively difficult.

Don’t believe me? Don’t you sit there guffawing. Try it. Go away and compose even a few paragraphs, come back to me and tell me you didn’t cringe in abject embarrassment at what you’d produced as a first sincere effort.

Given that reality, how in heaven’s name did someone else we’ve heard of ever seriously write, uh, uh…. Never mind. I digress. ;-)

Free Stock Photo: Illustration of a red heart and I love you text.

Free Stock Photo: Illustration of a red heart and I love you text.

Yesterday I had one of those days. The literary agonizing (type, delete, think a bit, type feverishly again, alter, delete, type more, re-read, consider throwing the PC out the window, etc.) that stems from wanting to see two important characters have an intimate relationship? Yet in the gut also not really wanting to see that happen?

Okay, friends, what are we going to do today?” Yes, and what a headache I had by mid-afternoon from staring too long at the PC screen trying to figure that out. I needed Tylenol. I flicked through the pages and found myself thinking, “Not bad. It needs more tweaking. But, God, I just don’t know about this.”

Nothing like trying to seek to escape a novelistic corner into which you’ve willingly painted yourself. Welcome to the world of the writer. I must be nuts.

Then again, of course we all know romance is often a bit corny and silly in our real lives, isn’t it?

I’m back at it again. I posted this because I needed a break…. again. No sign of a headache again, though; but give it time. Today’s still young. :-)

Views vs Likes

I’ve recently stumbled on advice from a blogging “guru” who asserts bloggers are best served by placing their sidebar to the left side. I think his sidebar also says he’s 20 years old. So clearly he must know what he’s talking about!

Fine. I’ve now moved mine from the right side to left. Okay, impress me. ;-)


While making that shift, I had a fiddle with the “Top Posts and Pages” listing. Doing so, I noticed that in altering it from “page views” to “likes,” only a couple of posts manage to make both groupings.

Very interesting. By far, my most “visited” post is, uh, on the Fifty Shades Of Grey film. However, it was also not “liked” nearly enough to make it to the top list based on “likes.”

That’s it: Get the rope. ;-) Many of you clearly do “read” stuff, but you also don’t always “like” it. Then again, of course I know you aren’t always going to “like” everything you “read.” :-)

UPDATE: That “Fifty Shades” Post

I’m sure this short update will be the highlight of your Wednesday. ;-)

A screening of scenes from that film is reported in the Guardian today.


Apparently it is looking like it may turn out to be, one might say, uh, Fifty Shades… of “Tame.”

Fifty Shades Of … Uh, Best Of Luck To ‘Em

In the supermarket checkout lane yesterday, I noticed a prominent magazine’s cover pushing the Fifty Shades of Grey film:


A film adaptation due for 2015 release? I suppose that should not be a surprise. After all, the book was a massive seller.

We are friends, and (of course) earnest and serious people here. :-) Let me say, I have not read it; and, indeed, I knew very little about it. But it has been background noise for a couple of years as an extremely risqué story.

In fact, I recall several women I know having referred to it with a giggle (usually derisively) as “Mummy p*rn.” Hearing that, and being a guy, I wasn’t going to ask for details. (Are you kidding?) So I knew almost nothing about its actual plot or main characters…. beyond the “Mummy p*rn” stuff.

After I got home from the store, I finally looked the book up on Wikipedia:

….While he purchases various items including cable ties, masking tape and rope, Ana informs Christian that Kate would like some photographs to go along with her article about him….

Errr. Hmmm. Uh, okay….

Well, I also don’t feel as badly here devoting a post to it, having learned via that Wikipedia page that even one Sir Salman Rushdie has an opinion on it:

“I’ve never read anything so badly written that got published. It made ‘Twilight’ look like ‘War and Peace.'”

We all know not every book is everyone’s cup of tea. And clearly the likes of Sir Salman are not the Fifty Shades author’s target audience. Also it is perhaps worth recalling that Sir Salman’s most famous work has itself been accused of being “unreadable.”

Fifty Shades’s literary qualities aside, the track record for such film efforts is decidedly not encouraging. So we can only but wish best of luck to the filmmakers who are aiming to bring that tale to the screen. Because it seems highly unlikely any filming of that story can end up “middling.”

The gut says the film must turn out either to be superbly done, artistic and earn movie-making acclaim…. or end up as another, say, Showgirls – another supposed-to-be “super sexy” film (which next year will have been released, ironically, 20 years ago), but which turned out to be a critical disaster and is now considered “one of the worst films ever made.”


UPDATE, March 26: The Guardian:

Early footage of the film of EL James’ bestselling books has disappointed, with the S&M toned down in favour of romance

It’s not a huge shock filmmakers seem to have gone the “tame” route. Given the story and what they would therefore appear to have been required to put on screen, that is probably much the wiser filmmaking decision. In comparison, as we know, books rely far more on …. a reader’s imagination….